Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

sulphur in fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sulphur in fuel

    Anyone know of anyplace to compare the amount of sulphur in brand X vs brand Y of gas? 91 octane or higher.

  • #2
    like a web site???

    I dunno but this sounds interesting
    2005 F-Super Stock National Champion
    2005 F-Super Stock Regional Champion

    We Don't inherit the world from our Parents, We borrow it from our Children

    Comment


    • #3
      Hmmmm, I couldn't find anything convenient, and I doubt there is anything convenient. The producers that have been aggressive in reducing their sulphur content (Sunoco, Irving) are fairly up front about their efforts to reduce sulphur, but they don't seem to advertise the content levels.

      The producers who are the worst offenders (and the most intransigent with respect to implementing reductions, like IOL and P.Can) seem to rely on massive obfuscastion efforts.

      This is a little dated, but you can try http://www.cbc.ca/consumers/market/f...lowsulphurgas/

      The links at the bottom of the page don't all work still, but they point you in the right direction.

      For the lowest sulphur content, I'd suggest using Sunoco Ultra 94. Sunoco claims to have the lowest sulphur content of any refiner in Ontario (see this) and the ethanol content only serves to further reduce sulphur. I think Pioneer has an ethanol blend as well, but I wouldn't vouch for the quality of the base gasoline.
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Eric "No Relation To Julia" Roberts
      E82, N54, MX5, PDQ, FEB, NRTJ
      "Slow in, fast out. Fast in, backwards out."

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Comment


      • #4
        ...another good reason to spend the money at sunoco.

        Does anyone know if there is any truth to the rumour that pioneer 93 is sunoco 94?

        Eric, what makes you think Petro-Can is one of the worst offenders?

        You may find this interesting.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hmm, I was expecting Mashall to reply to this thread by now...

          I believe this analysis was part of the 2nd yr Mech Eng curriculum at McMaster. Therefore, I would expect other PEO accredited Ontario universities to be the same.

          Try phoning up a university or asking a friend enrolled in Mech Eng.

          BTW, I'm surprised there's hardly anything on the web about this.
          Last edited by MiG-29 Foxbat; 09-20-2003, 10:56 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Wasn't a part of my mech program at Mac...

            Sulphur content will vary depending on which refinery produced it. Within the next year sulphur content in all of the fuels will drop dramatically with the new legislation.
            Chris Atkins
            Member of the Road Course Mustang Brotherhood (1/2/2007)

            06 Mustang GT (SGT3)
            07 Mazdaspeed3

            (FOR SALE)
            91 Mustang GT SGT2

            Gone to oil country!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chris91GT
              Wasn't a part of my mech program at Mac...
              Hey Mac, is Dr. Judd still there? The old one, unless his son finally managed to get his thesis listened to!

              I did that analysis as part of one of Dr. Judd's labs.

              Logan, maybe a race team might be able to help. Or try Cambridge Materials and Testing for help.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Logan
                ...another good reason to spend the money at sunoco.

                Does anyone know if there is any truth to the rumour that pioneer 93 is sunoco 94?

                Eric, what makes you think Petro-Can is one of the worst offenders?
                Petro-Can was only slightly better than IOL in this analysis. Of course, it's a little old...
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Eric "No Relation To Julia" Roberts
                E82, N54, MX5, PDQ, FEB, NRTJ
                "Slow in, fast out. Fast in, backwards out."

                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MiG-29 Foxbat
                  Hey Mac, is Dr. Judd still there? The old one, unless his son finally managed to get his thesis listened to!

                  I did that analysis as part of one of Dr. Judd's labs.
                  Judd is still around... only because they can't find anyone else to teach heat transfer.
                  Chris Atkins
                  Member of the Road Course Mustang Brotherhood (1/2/2007)

                  06 Mustang GT (SGT3)
                  07 Mazdaspeed3

                  (FOR SALE)
                  91 Mustang GT SGT2

                  Gone to oil country!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't think my engine likes high ethanol content gasoline. I find it feels like it has better power with the new Shell 91 formula instead of Sunoco 94. But that could be either octane level or ethanol content. Haven't tried Sunoco 91 lately .. no stations close to me.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Logan
                      ...another good reason to spend the money at sunoco.

                      Does anyone know if there is any truth to the rumour that pioneer 93 is sunoco 94?

                      Eric, what makes you think Petro-Can is one of the worst offenders?

                      You may find this interesting.
                      They definitely have a close relationship - check out the Sunoco website and you'll see references to Pioneer stations:
                      http://www.sunoco.ca/content.asp?id=4

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X